Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8949921 Pathology - Research and Practice 2018 9 Pages PDF
Abstract
Manual assessment of tumor budding using pan-cytokeratin stained tumor slides exhibited high correlations (Spearman Rank 0.84-0.89, p < 0.001),excellent agreement between observers (Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.86 -0.87) and 2.20 higher odds for regional metastases with increasing budding counts (p = 0.017). Digital image analysis correlated well to manual assessment (Spearman Rank 0.71-0.88) and agreement between the two methods was good (ICC 0.62-0.82). However, only a trend towards increased odds for metastatic progression was found for the adjusted digital estimates (p = 0.076). Digital estimates were higher than manual estimates, demonstrated by a systematic median difference of 3-4.5 buds. Image analysis was highly reproducible between users of the algorithm (ICC 0.98). In conclusion, assessment of tumor budding using pan-cytokeratin stained tumor slides is a method with high correlation and agreement between observers. Digital image analysis quantifies budding tumor cells in high agreement with manual estimates, but approval of the digital slides by a pathologist is mandatory. The method qualifies for further investigation.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Cancer Research
Authors
, , , , , , , ,