Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8949921 | Pathology - Research and Practice | 2018 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Manual assessment of tumor budding using pan-cytokeratin stained tumor slides exhibited high correlations (Spearman Rank 0.84-0.89, pâ¯<â¯0.001),excellent agreement between observers (Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.86 -0.87) and 2.20 higher odds for regional metastases with increasing budding counts (pâ¯=â¯0.017). Digital image analysis correlated well to manual assessment (Spearman Rank 0.71-0.88) and agreement between the two methods was good (ICC 0.62-0.82). However, only a trend towards increased odds for metastatic progression was found for the adjusted digital estimates (pâ¯=â¯0.076). Digital estimates were higher than manual estimates, demonstrated by a systematic median difference of 3-4.5 buds. Image analysis was highly reproducible between users of the algorithm (ICC 0.98). In conclusion, assessment of tumor budding using pan-cytokeratin stained tumor slides is a method with high correlation and agreement between observers. Digital image analysis quantifies budding tumor cells in high agreement with manual estimates, but approval of the digital slides by a pathologist is mandatory. The method qualifies for further investigation.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Cancer Research
Authors
Rikke Karlin Jepsen, Louise Laurberg Klarskov, Michael Friis Lippert, Guy Wayne Novotny, Tine Plato Hansen, Ib Jarle Christensen, Estrid Høgdall, Lene Buhl Riis,