Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8955868 International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 2018 5 Pages PDF
Abstract
Our audit and education-based intervention resulted in a lasting and meaningful 10% change in practice. Our provincial rate is similar to that of a previously recommended benchmark rate of 60%, but we continue to see significant variation by center, suggesting further room for improvement in provincial standardization. With emerging evidence in support of ablative radiation therapy for select populations of patients with bone metastases, future benchmark rates of SFRT should be readdressed. However, our data suggest that programmatic comparison and dissemination of SFRT prescribing practices can achieve a population-based SFRT utilization rate near 60%.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Physics and Astronomy Radiation
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,