| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 903136 | Body Image | 2012 | 4 Pages |
The purpose was to compare self-report and psychophysiological assessment techniques in the measurement of emotional response to body image cues. Female college students (n = 53; % Caucasian = 53.6; M body mass index = 26.1 kg/m2) completed the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-3) and viewed photos of themselves both unaltered and morphed to simulate weight gain. Response to the photos was assessed by self-report and the affect modulated startle paradigm. EDI-3 Drive for Thinness (DT) and Body Dissatisfaction (BD) scale scores were correlated with startled amplitude for the largest simulated weight gain photo. Startle eye blink amplitude predicted more variance in DT and BD subscales than self-reported response to the image. The affect modulated startle paradigm may provide unique information in the assessment of eating disorder symptomatology that cannot be captured via self-report techniques, and has potential to inform evaluation of treatment outcomes of eating and body image disorders.
► Compared self-report and objective assessment of response to body image cues. ► Participants saw self-photos both unaltered and altered to simulate weight gain. ► Startle response while viewing photos and ratings of photos were collected. ► Startle amplitude better predicted EDI-3 DT & BD subscale scores than self-report. ► Startle paradigm may inform evaluation of treatment outcomes for eating disorders.
