Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9034660 | Toxicology | 2005 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
Anesthetized pigs were injected i.m. with 500Â mg HI-6 dichloride (HI-6 2Cl) (1-[[[4-(aminocarbonyl)-pyridinio]methoxy]methyl]-2[(hydroxyimino)methyl]pyridinium dichloride; CAS 34433-31-3)) or the molar equivalent of HI-6 dimethanesulphonate (HI-6 DMS) 633Â mg. Plasma HI-6 concentrations were measured by HPLC (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60Â min and every 30Â min until 4Â h or 6Â h following the i.v. or i.m. dose respectively) while a variety of physiological responses were continuously examined. HI-6 (500Â mg 2Cl or 633Â mg DMS) resulted in an identical pharmacokinetic profile unaffected by atropine co-administration. Neither HI-6 salt resulted in clinically significant changes in cardiovascular or respiratory function. HI-6 DMS (1899Â mg i.v.) resulted in plasma HI-6 concentrations about 10 times higher than measured following i.m. 500Â mg 2Cl or 633Â mg DMS and resulted in small transitory effect on mean arterial pressure. Atropine plus HI-6 DMS (1-9Â mg/kg or 127-172Â mg/kg i.m.) protected up to 100% of guinea pigs exposed to 5Â ÃÂ LD50 of GF (cyclohexyl methyl phosphonoflouridate) or soman (pinacolyl methylphosphonofluoridate) (GD) respectively. The results suggest that the two HI-6 salts have a similar pharmacokinetic profile while HI-6 DMS appears extremely safe and effective against nerve agents and may be as suitable for human use.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Environmental Science
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Authors
Paul M. Lundy, Ira Hill, Pierre Lecavalier, Murray G. Hamilton, Cory Vair, Corey Davidson, Kendal L. Weatherby, Bradley J. Berger,