Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9048199 | Manual Therapy | 2005 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if, within a normal population: (1) palpation of the humeral head, relative to the acromion, in three static positions, was a reliable technique (2) there was a difference in humeral head position between the dominant and non-dominant shoulders in the three positions (3) there was a difference in humeral head position relative to the acromion between the arm at side (AS), the 90 ° abduction/external rotation (AER) and 90 ° abduction/internal rotation (AIR) positions. This test-retest study recorded palpation landmarks using a standardized protocol. Intra-tester reliability was above 0.8 for both AS and AER and all other ICCs were below 0.6. There was no systematic difference between dominant and non-dominant sides in any of the three positions (AS P=0.408, AER P=0.448, AIR P=0.233). There was a significant difference in measurements between each position (P<0.001). It can be concluded that, palpation of humeral head position in relation to the acromion is a reliable technique in the AS position. These normative data provide a baseline that can be used for future comparison if differences are found to exist in subgroups with pathological shoulder conditions where larger glenohumeral translations are thought to exist.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Authors
David Bryde, B. Jane Freure, Leighton Jones, Melanie Werstine, N. Kathryn Briffa,