| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 906170 | Eating Behaviors | 2016 | 8 Pages |
•The new R/R model was superior to previous models in examining eating behaviors.•Dieters and nondieters differed on many reasoned and reactive factors.•Attitudes and nutrition knowledge were related to reasoned intentions.•Attitudes, nutrition knowledge, and affect were related to reactive willingness.•Intentions and willingness were related to healthy and unhealthy food consumption.
Female college students are prone to unhealthy eating patterns that can impact long-term health. This study examined female students' healthy and unhealthy eating behaviors with three decision-making models. Specifically, the theory of reasoned action, prototype/willingness model, and new reasoned/reactive model were compared to determine how reasoned (logical) and reactive (impulsive) factors relate to dietary decisions. Females (N = 583, Mage = 20.89 years) completed measures on reasoned cognitions about foods (attitudes, subjective norms, nutrition knowledge, intentions to eat foods), reactive cognitions about foods (prototypes, affect, willingness to eat foods), dieting, and food consumption. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed the new reasoned/reactive model to be the preeminent model for examining eating behaviors. This model showed that attitudes were related to intentions and willingness to eat healthy and unhealthy foods. Affect was related to willingness to eat healthy and unhealthy foods, whereas nutrition knowledge was related to intentions and willingness to eat healthy foods only. Intentions and willingness were related to healthy and unhealthy food consumption. Dieting status played a moderating role in the model and revealed mean-level differences between dieters and nondieters. This study highlights the importance of specific factors in relation to female students' eating decisions and unveils a comprehensive model for examining health behaviors.
