Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9076210 | Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport | 2005 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
We compared the oxygen uptake (VÌO2) response of spring- and endurance-trained runners for an exhaustive square wave run lasting â¼ 2 minutes. Six sprinters and six middle- and long-distance runners each performed two exhaustive square wave runs lasting â¼ 2 min and two exhaustive ramp tests. VÌ22 was determined breath-by-breath (QP9000; Morgan Medical, Rainham, UK) and averaged across the two repeats of each test; for the square wave test, the averaged VÌO2 response (excluding the first 15 s) was then modelled using a monoexponential function. Both VÌO2peak for the ramp test (67.5±3.3 vs. 54.5±8.5 ml.kgâ1.minâ1; P= 0.006) and the asymptotic VÌO2 for the square wave run (59.6±2.7 vs. 50.7±4.6 ml.kgâ1.minâ1; P= 0.002) were higher for the endurance than for the sprint group. However, as a percentage of VÌO2peak, this asymptotic VÌO2 did not differ between the groups (90.1±3.2% (endurance) vs. 96.2±9.0% (sprint); P= 0.145). Across all 12 subjects, the %VÌO2peak attained in the square wave run was negatively correlated with VÌO2peak (Pearson's r= -0.811, P= 0.001). We conclude that VÌO2max is more important than training history as a determinant of the %VÌO2max attained in exhaustive square wave running lasting â¼ 2 min.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
SB Draper, DM Wood,