| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 910445 | Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry | 2012 | 5 Pages |
Background and objectivesPrevious research has found that in some contexts, suppression increases distress, whereas acceptance decreases distress. It is not clear, however, whether these two common forms of emotion regulation have comparable or divergent physiological and behavioral effects during the anticipation and receipt of a painful stimulus.MethodsTo address this issue, we randomized participants to suppression, acceptance, or no instruction control groups, and assessed their cardiovascular and behavioral responses while they anticipated and then received electric shocks.ResultsFindings revealed that compared to the control condition (1) acceptance and suppression led to comparable reductions in pain reports and cardiac defense responses; and (2) acceptance led to greater reductions in reports of anticipatory anxiety than suppression.LimitationsThe current study tested only two emotion regulation techniques in the context of a pain-inducing stimulus that has limited ecological validity.ConclusionsIn contrast to previous research, we found that both acceptance and suppression are effective in reducing pain and anxiety in response to experimentally induced pain.
► We compared the efficacy of acceptance and suppression in reducing pain and anxiety. ► Both emotion regulation techniques reduced pain, anxiety and cardiac defense responses. ► Acceptance was most effective in reducing anxiety.
