Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
916831 Cognitive Psychology 2015 14 Pages PDF
Abstract

•We explore the motivation–cognition interface behaviorally & computationally.•Decision-making is influenced by the interaction between local and global motivation.•A match between chronic motivational state and task framing enhances performance.•Computational models indicate that a regulatory match increases goal-based processing.

Research distinguishes between a habitual, model-free system motivated toward immediately rewarding actions, and a goal-directed, model-based system motivated toward actions that improve future state. We examined the balance of processing in these two systems during state-based decision-making. We tested a regulatory fit hypothesis (Maddox & Markman, 2010) that predicts that global trait motivation affects the balance of habitual- vs. goal-directed processing but only through its interaction with the task framing as gain-maximization or loss-minimization. We found support for the hypothesis that a match between an individual’s chronic motivational state and the task framing enhances goal-directed processing, and thus state-based decision-making. Specifically, chronic promotion-focused individuals under gain-maximization and chronic prevention-focused individuals under loss-minimization both showed enhanced state-based decision-making. Computational modeling indicates that individuals in a match between global chronic motivational state and local task reward structure engaged more goal-directed processing, whereas those in a mismatch engaged more habitual processing.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
, , ,