Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
916909 Cognitive Psychology 2012 39 Pages PDF
Abstract

Humans routinely make inductive generalizations about unobserved features of objects. Previous accounts of inductive reasoning often focus on inferences about a single object or feature: accounts of causal reasoning often focus on a single object with one or more unobserved features, and accounts of property induction often focus on a single feature that is unobserved for one or more objects. We explore problems where people must make inferences about multiple objects and features, and propose that people solve these problems by integrating knowledge about features with knowledge about objects. We evaluate three computational methods for integrating multiple systems of knowledge: the output combination approach combines the outputs produced by these systems, the distribution combination approach combines the probability distributions captured by these systems, and the structure combination approach combines a graph structure over features with a graph structure over objects. Three experiments explore problems where participants make inferences that draw on causal relationships between features and taxonomic relationships between animals, and we find that the structure combination approach provides the best account of our data.

► We study how people infer missing entries in a matrix of objects by features. ► Graph structures can capture knowledge about objects and knowledge about features. ► These graphs can be combined to support inferences about the whole matrix. ► Combining graphs explains human inferences better than other computational models.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
, , ,