Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
916936 | Cognitive Psychology | 2011 | 28 Pages |
Unlike homophonous meanings, which are semantically unrelated (e.g., the use of bat to refer to a baseball bat and a flying rodent), polysemous meanings are systematically related to one another (e.g., the use of book, CD, and video to refer to physical objects, as in ‘the leather book’, or to the intellectual content they contain, as in ‘the profound book’). But do perceived relations among polysemous meanings reflect the presence of generative lexical or conceptual structures that permit the meanings of these words to shift? If so, these structures may also support children’s early representations of polysemous meanings. In four studies, we demonstrate (1) that four-year-old children can understand both the concrete and abstract meanings of words like book, (2) that when taught a novel label for one of these meanings, children can readily understand an extension of that label to the other meaning, and (3) that extension does not occur between two homophonous meanings, which share a common phonological form but are otherwise unrelated. We conclude that the polysemous meanings of words like book rely on a common representational base early in development, and suggest that this may be the result of foundational, generative properties of the lexicon or conceptual system.
► We examine 4-year-olds’ representations of polysemous and homophonous meanings. ► Children extend novel labels between polysemous but not homophonous meanings. ► Homophonous meanings are separate words by four years of age. ► Some polysemous meanings rely on a common representational base by four years of age. ► A polysemy/homophony distinction does not await meta-linguistic development.