| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9173491 | Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2005 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Neither PND nor endograft migration was observed with the BES endograft. The nature of the SES may be responsible for the observed neck dilatation and device migration after EVAR with SES endografts. This study suggests that BES may be a better fixation method for EVAR.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Mahmoud B. MD, Takao MD, Frank J. MD, Tina MD, Evan C. MD, Amit R. MD, Carlos MD, William MD, Nicholas J. MD, Juan C. MD,