Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
920179 Acta Psychologica 2011 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

This study investigates the relative contribution of body parts in the elaboration of a whole-body egocentric attraction phenomenon previously observed during earth-based judgments. This was addressed through a particular earth-based task requiring estimating the possibility of passing under a projected line, imagining a forward horizontal displacement. Different postural configurations were tested, involving whole-body tilt, trunk tilt alone or head tilt alone. Two legs positions relative to the trunk were manipulated. Results showed systematic deviations of the subjective “passability” toward the tilt, linearly related to the tilt magnitude. For each postural configuration, the egocentric influence appeared to be highly dependent on the position of trunk and head axes, whereas the legs position appeared not relevant. When compared to the whole-body tilt condition, tilting the trunk alone consistently reduced the amount of the deviation toward the tilt, whereas tilting the head alone consistently increased it. Our results suggest that several specific effects from multiple body parts can account for the global deviation of the estimates observed during whole-body tilt. Most importantly, we support that the relative contribution of the body segments could mainly depend on a reweighting process, probably based on the reliability of sensory information available for a particular postural set.

► Geocentric judgements are known to be attracted toward whole-body pitch tilts. ► We tested the relative contribution of different body parts in this effect. ► Head and trunk orientation contributed to this phenomenon, but not legs position. ► The influence of trunk orientation was weaker than the effect of whole-body tilt. ► The influence of head tilt alone was stronger than the effect of whole-body tilt.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
, , ,