Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
920646 | Acta Psychologica | 2006 | 39 Pages |
Abstract
This study contrasts the structural bottleneck and the resource view of attentional limits in time-sharing performance. The research incorporated features of the psychological refractory period (PRP) and the relative priority paradigm designed to maximize joint performance. A main distinction between the two attention views was their prediction on the extent that graded performance tradeoff was possible with graded priority changes. Detailed analysis of the performance and time-sharing strategies called into question the conclusions based exclusively on the PRP paradigm.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Pamela S. Tsang,