Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9210837 | Journal of Dentistry | 2005 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolvâ¢) to conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth.Methods. Twenty-two freshly extracted teeth with varying degree of caries were treated using both of these methods. One part of each caries lesion was prepared using the Carisolv⢠method and the other part using conventional hand excavation. The third (middle) part was left untreated to serve as control. Histological preparations of each tooth were then made and examined in order to compare the quality of the preparations. Length and area of residual caries, microhardness of the dentine in each group and time needed for preparation were analysed.Results. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the amount of residual caries in the cavity walls treated using the two methods.Conclusions. The Carisolv⢠method was significantly more time consuming than conventional preparation using hand excavator. However, both methods removed caries efficiently.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
Lorenz Flückiger, Tuomas Waltimo, Hermann Stich, Adrian Lussi,