| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9211476 | Journal of Endodontics | 2005 | 5 Pages | 
Abstract
												This study histologically compared the in vivo debridement efficacy of hand/rotary canal preparation versus a hand/rotary/ultrasound technique in mesial root canals of vital mandibular molars. Group 1 consisted of 16 teeth prepared with a hand/rotary technique whereas group 2 consisted of 15 teeth prepared in similar fashion but followed by 1 min of ultrasonic irrigation, per canal, utilizing an ultrasonic needle in a MiniEndo unit. Five uninstrumented mandibular molars served as histologic controls. After extraction and histologic preparation, 0.5 μm cross-sections, taken every 0.2 mm from the 1- to 3-mm apical levels, were evaluated for percentage of tissue removal. Nonparametric analysis revealed mean percent canal and isthmus cleanliness values to be significantly higher for group 2 at all levels evaluated, except one. In conclusion, the 1 min use of the ultrasonic needle after hand/rotary instrumentation resulted in significantly cleaner canals and isthmuses in the mesial roots of mandibular molars.
											Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
												
											Authors
												Rubin DDS, MS, John DDS, MS, Al DDS, MS, Mike DDS, MA, 
											