Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
926389 Cognition 2013 17 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Shows equivalent inhibitory control in temporal preparation and no-go responses.•Inhibitory control explains classic behavioral effects in temporal preparation.•Good fit of trace-conditioning model supports the role of inhibition in preparation.

During the foreperiod (FP) of a warned reaction task, participants engage in a process of temporal preparation to speed response to the impending target stimulus. Previous neurophysiological studies have shown that inhibition is applied during FP to prevent premature response. Previous behavioral studies have shown that the duration of FP on both the current and the preceding trial codetermine response time to the target. Integrating these findings, the present study tested the hypothesis that the behavioral effects find their origin in response inhibition on the preceding trial. In two experiments the variable-FP paradigm was combined with a go/no-go task, in which no-go stimuli required explicit response inhibition. The resulting data pattern revealed sequential effects of both FP (long or short) and response requirement (go or no-go), which could be jointly understood as expressions of response inhibition, consistent with the hypothesis.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
,