Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
926693 | Cognition | 2008 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
An extensive body of research suggests that the distinction between doing and allowing plays a critical role in shaping moral appraisals. Here, we report evidence from a pair of experiments suggesting that the converse is also true: moral appraisals affect doing/allowing judgments. Specifically, morally bad behavior is more likely to be construed as actively ‘doing’ than as passively ‘allowing’. This finding adds to a growing list of folk concepts influenced by moral appraisal, including causation and intentional action. We therefore suggest that the present finding favors the view that moral appraisal plays a pervasive role in shaping diverse cognitive representations across multiple domains.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Fiery Cushman, Joshua Knobe, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,