Slow mapping: Color word learning as a gradual inductive process

Most current accounts of color word acquisition propose that the delay between children’s first production of color words and adult-like understanding is due to problems abstracting color as a domain of meaning. Here we present evidence against this hypothesis, and show that, from the time children produce color words in a labeling task they use them to represent color. In Experiment 1, an analysis of early color word errors finds that, before acquiring adult-like understanding, children make systematic hypotheses about color word meanings, which are best characterized as overextensions of adult meanings. Using a comprehension task, Experiment 2 finds that these overextensions are due to overly broad color categories, rather than a communicative strategy. These results indicate that the delay between production and adult-like understanding of color words is not due to difficulties abstracting color, but is largely attributable to the problem of determining the color boundaries marked by specific languages.

► Prevalent views suggest that difficulty abstracting color delays color word acquisition. ► Here, we show that children’s early color labeling errors are highly systematic. ► Children’s errors in color word comprehension are also systematic. ► This suggests that color word difficulty is not due to problems with abstraction. ► Rather, it supports a slow inductive process of determining category boundaries.