| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9270692 | Journal of Infection | 2005 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Previously reported differences in the rate of urinary tract infection by circumcision status could be entirely due to sampling and selection bias. Until clinical studies adequately control for sources of bias, circumcision should not be recommended as a preventive for urinary tract infection.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Authors
R.S. Van Howe,