Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
927668 | Consciousness and Cognition | 2008 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Simulationists have recently started to employ the term “empathy” when characterizing our most basic understanding of other minds. I agree that empathy is crucial, but I think it is being misconstrued by the simulationists. Using some ideas to be found in Scheler’s classical discussion of empathy, I will argue for a different understanding of the notion. More specifically, I will argue that there are basic levels of interpersonal understanding—in particular the understanding of emotional expressions—that are not explicable in terms of simulation-plus-projection routines.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Dan Zahavi,