Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
927938 | Consciousness and Cognition | 2006 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Zadra, Desjardins, and Marcotte (2006) tested several predictions derived from the Threat Simulation Theory of dreaming (Revonsuo, 2000a) in a large sample of recurrent dreams. In response to these findings, Valli and Revonsuo (2006) presented a commentary outlining alternate conceptualizations and explanations for the results obtained. We argue that many points raised by Valli and Revonsuo do not accurately reflect our main findings and at times present a biased assessment of the data. In this article, we provide necessary clarifications and responses to each one of their main points of discussion.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Sophie Desjardins, Antonio Zadra,