Similar changes in muscle fiber phenotype with differentiated consequences for rate of force development: Endurance versus resistance training

•END reduces knee flexor RFD, related to the changes in type IIx fibers.•RT increases eccentric knee extensor and flexor strength whereas endurance training does not.•Early RFD is positively associated with type IIx fiber area percentage.

Resistance training has been shown to positively affect the rate of force development (RFD) whereas there is currently no data on the effect of endurance training on RFD. Subjects completed ten weeks of either resistance training (RT, n = 7) or endurance cycling (END, n = 7). Pre and post measurements included biopsies obtained from m. vastus lateralis to quantify fiber phenotype and fiber area and isokinetic dynamometer tests to quantify maximal torque (Nm) and RFD (Nm/s) at 0–30, 0–50, 0–100 and 0–200 ms during maximal isometric contraction for both knee extensors and flexors. Both groups increased the area percentage of type IIa fibers (p < .01) and decreased the area percentage of type IIx fibers (p = .05), whereas only RT increased fiber size (p < .05). RT significantly increased eccentric, concentric and isometric strength for both knee extensors and flexors, whereas END did not. RT increased 200 ms RFD (p < .01) in knee flexor RFD and a tendency towards an increase at 100 ms (p < .1), whereas tendencies towards decreases were observed for the END group at 30, 50 and 100 ms (p < .1), resulting in RT having a higher RFD than END at post (p < .01). In conclusion, resistance training may be very important for maintaining RFD, whereas endurance training may negatively impact RFD.