Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
931984 Journal of Memory and Language 2012 15 Pages PDF
Abstract

Givenness tends to lead to acoustic reduction in speech, but little is known about whether linguistic and non-linguistic givenness affect reduction similarly, and there is little consensus about the underlying psychological mechanisms. We examined speakers’ pronunciations of target object nouns in an instruction-giving task, where speakers saw objects move and described this to a listener. The target objects were linguistically or non-linguistically given (i.e. spoken aloud or flashed). With predictability held constant, linguistic givenness resulted in more reduction than non-linguistic givenness, while both elicited more reduction than control conditions. We use these findings to consider two possible mechanisms for givenness effects: an explicit information status-based trigger account and a facilitation-based account. We propose that our findings are most naturally accounted for by a mechanism in which givenness leads to facilitation of representations and processes in the production system, which leads to reduction.

► Non-linguistic givenness creates durational reduction when paired with predictability. ► Linguistic givenness creates durational reduction when paired with predictability, or on its own. ► Linguistic givenness creates more reduction than non-linguistic givenness. ► An activation-based model accounts for these findings more adequately than a discourse-status-based model.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
, ,