Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
932119 Journal of Memory and Language 2011 15 Pages PDF
Abstract

We investigated the mechanisms by which fillers, such as uh and um, affect memory for discourse. Participants listened to and attempted to recall recorded passages adapted from Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. The type and location of interruptions were manipulated through digital splicing. In Experiment 1, we tested a processing time account of fillers’ effects. While fillers facilitated recall, coughs matched in duration to the fillers impaired recall, suggesting that fillers’ benefits cannot be attributed to adding processing time. In Experiment 2, fillers’ locations were manipulated based on norming data to be either predictive or non-predictive of upcoming material. Fillers facilitated recall in both cases, inconsistent with an account in which listeners predict upcoming material using past experience with the distribution of fillers. Instead, these results suggest an attentional orienting account in which fillers direct attention to the speech stream but do not always result in specific predictions about upcoming material.

► We test the effects of disfluent filled pauses on recall of a discourse. ► Fillers improve recall whether or not they predict upcoming discourse boundaries. ► No benefit from coughs of equal duration, ruling out a processing time effect. ► Fillers have an attentional orienting effect.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
, ,