Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
933046 | Journal of Pragmatics | 2012 | 13 Pages |
A body of research in conversation analysis has identified a range of structurally-provided positions in which sources of trouble in talk-in-interaction can be addressed using repair. These practices are contained within what Schegloff (1992) calls the repair space. In this paper, I examine a rare instance in which a source of trouble is not resolved within the repair space and comes to be addressed outside of it. The practice by which this occurs is a post-completion account; that is, an account that is produced after the possible completion of the sequence containing a source of trouble. Unlike fourth position repair, the final repair position available within the repair space, this account is not made in preparation for a revised response to the trouble-source turn. Its more restrictive aim, rather, is to circumvent an ongoing difference between the parties involved. I argue that because the trouble is addressed in this manner, and in this particular position, the repair space can be considered as being limited to the sequence in which a source of trouble originates.
► I review existing research that demarcates the repair space in talk-in-interaction. ► I examine how a trouble-source is attended to outside the repair space. ► My analysis shows that it is addressed with a post-completion account. ► Such research highlights the boundary of the repair space.