Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
935352 | Lingua | 2013 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
•A response to Beavers & Koontz-Garboden's reply to Horvath and Siloni (2011a).•We examine and discard BKG's counterarguments one by one.•We present further evidence that reaffirms Horvath & Siloni's conclusion that there is no Cause ingredient in anticausatives.
This paper reaffirms the conclusion of Horvath and Siloni (2011a) that unaccusatives – with or without the so-called reflexive morphology – involve no Cause ingredient whatsoever. Arguments based on the distribution of the modifier by itself, negation, and the Greek cause preposition apo show that. Beavers and Koontz-Garboden's (in this issue) counterarguments to Horvath and Siloni are either based on partial data or confounded by independent factors.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
Language and Linguistics
Authors
Julia Horvath, Tal Siloni,