Resultatives, progressives, statives, and relevance: The temporal pragmatics of the -ite suffix in Totela

⿢The -ite suffix has progressive and resultative temporal semantics in Totela.⿢We analyze it aspectually as a stativizer.⿢It describes a property of the subject, relevant within the discourse context.⿢Its temporal semantics are derived from conversational principles of relevance.⿢Relevance is a crucial connection between progressives and resultatives.

This article presents the verbal suffix -ite in Totela (Bantu, Namibia and Zambia), which has variable temporal interpretations based both on lexical aspect (situation type) and on discourse context. The same -ite-marked predicate may be interpreted as referencing a situation that is past (resultative-like readings) or present (progressive-like readings) with respect to utterance time. The suffix is analyzed as having the aspectual function of a stativizer, asserting a relevant property of the utterance's subject. Temporal interpretations with respect to utterance time (or other perspective time) are derived from principles of relevance: the state described by an -ite-marked predicate is interpreted so that it answer the current question under discussion in discourse. The -ite suffix, most likely related to a historical resultative, still specifies a result state, but the temporal specifications of that result state are weakened and must be inferred through context. Cross-linguistic comparison of -ite with other markers that have both perfect/resultative and progressive readings suggests that the pragmatic notion of relevance ⿿ and not only commonalities in temporal semantics (e.g. focus on post-state; stativizing functions) ⿿ may be a key factor in the perfect/resultative/progressive connection.