Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
9429611 Neuroscience Letters 2005 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that early cortical potentials (e.g. N1) that are evoked by perturbations to upright stance are associated with sensory processing of the initial perturbation and that later potentials may represent cognitive processing of this perturbation. However, it has also been suggested that later cortical potentials could reflect sensory and motor processing of later phases of the postural reaction. The current study set out to provide additional insight into the association between perturbation-evoked cortical potentials and postural reactions evoked by whole-body perturbations. By altering the deceleration onset of the perturbation, which altered the timing of later postural responses, we determined whether changes in later postural responses were associated with changes in later potentials. Based on previous work, we hypothesized that later potentials would not be associated with changes in later postural responses. During stance, seven healthy young adults were instructed to maintain their balance following two types of perturbations: (1) acceleration phase immediately followed by a deceleration phase (TASK 1), and (2) acceleration phase followed by a delayed deceleration phase (TASK 2). In spite of profound task differences in later postural responses, results revealed no significant differences in later potentials. This work provides additional support for the idea that latter elements of perturbation-evoked cortical responses are likely independent of evoked motor reactions required to maintain stability.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neuroscience (General)
Authors
, , ,