Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
947805 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2014 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

•An identifiable counterpart is one who is specified but not identified.•We found that identifiable counterparts increased competitive behaviors.•Participants exerted more effort and performed better against identifiable others.•Participants bid more money on a product when counterparts were identifiable.•The effect is mediated by an increased aversion to a possible loss.

Research on pro-social behavior reports greater generosity and helping behavior toward merely identifiable persons, whose identities have been determined but not revealed, than toward unspecified, “statistical” targets. This work investigates whether identifiability can have a similar effect on behavior in competitive contexts. Data from three experiments show that providing arbitrary, non-identifying information about one's competition enhances one's goal-driven behavior: in competitive tasks, participants competing vs. merely identifiable counterparts displayed greater perseverance and performed better than participants whose counterparts were undetermined; in a dyadic bid setting, participants offered more money to outbid an identifiable counterpart for an auctioned product than an unspecified counterpart. In addition, we found that the effects of identifiability on competitors' behavior were associated more strongly with the motivation not to lose than with the desire to win.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, ,