Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
948342 | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 2011 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Research shows that participants shoot armed Blacks more frequently and quickly than armed Whites, but make don't-shoot responses more frequently and quickly for unarmed Whites than unarmed Blacks. We argue that this bias reflects the perception of threat — specifically, threat associated with Black males. Other danger cues (not just race) may create a similar predisposition to shoot, and if these cues promote shooting when the target is White, they should attenuate racial bias. We embedded targets in threatening and safe backgrounds. Racial bias was evident in safe contexts but disappeared when context signaled danger, and this reduction was largely due to an increased tendency to shoot White targets.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
Joshua Correll, Bernd Wittenbrink, Bernadette Park, Charles M. Judd, Arina Goyle,