Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
952256 Social Science & Medicine 2015 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Enhances discussions of “One Health” biosecurity through a focus on food security.•Documents shortcomings of health policy based on global unity.•Evaluates limitations of “scaling up” in the field of nutritional health.•Reveals the value of attending to contingencies in global security agendas.•Contributes to the development of collaborative research methods.

Scientists in the Netherlands are cultivating edible insects to address concerns of international food security. Committed to the One World, One Health (OWOH) movement, their research aims to create a safe and effective global solution to the conjoined problems of climate change and an increasing worldwide demand for protein. Their preliminary work is promising, as it suggests that when compared to other sources of meat, insects can be an efficient, safe, and low-impact source of nutrients. Additionally, in many sites with endemic malnutrition, people find insects tasty. The problem these scientists are grappling with, however, is that insects that are easily mass-produced are not the insects people typically want to eat. This paper shows how the contingency of edibility complicates existing scientific models of travel that posit that singular objects spread peripherally outwards from a center into a globally connected, singular world. The scientists are finding that the production of successful food products necessitates that insects be constantly tinkered with: there is no “insect” that can be globally edible since “the global” itself is not a singular entity. This in turn complicates the vision of replicability and “scaling up” inherent in an OWOH vision of science. The researchers' process of moving their goods from the laboratory boxes they work with into the mealtime practices they seek to impact is compelling them to cultivate and articulate new ideals for research, methods of translation, and pathways by which goods can travel. They are finding that if they want to affect the health of “the world,” they must engage with many different worlds.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
,