Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
958449 | Journal of Empirical Finance | 2013 | 18 Pages |
We investigate whether diversity in points of view within corporate boards, as captured by the diversity in political ideology of board members, can affect a firm's performance. We employ personal political contributions' data to measure political ideology distance among groups of inside, outside directors and the CEO. Our empirical evidence strongly supports the notion that outside directors' monitoring effectiveness is more likely to be enhanced when their viewpoints are distinct from those of management. We find that ideologically diverse boards are associated with better firm performance, lower agency costs and less insiders' discretionary power over the firm's Political Action Committee (PAC) spending. Taken together, our results lead us to conclude that multiplicity of standpoints in corporate boardrooms is imperative for board effectiveness.
► Does viewpoint diversity in corporate boards affect performance? ► We use board members' PAC contributions to proxy for political ideology diversity. ► We show that political ideology diversity in corporate boards improves performance.