Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
958714 Journal of Empirical Finance 2006 16 Pages PDF
Abstract

The pricing of the Chen, Roll, and Ross (CRR) macrovariables is re-examined and found to be surprisingly sensitive to reasonable alternative procedures for generating size portfolio returns and estimating their betas. These methods include the full-period post-ranking return approach used in many recent studies. Strong evidence of pricing is obtained only for their industrial production growth factor and, in another contrast, for the VW market index. In particular, the corporate-government bond return spread, an important factor in CRR, is insignificantly negative for the 1958–1983 period, corroborating the cross-sectional regression results.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics and Econometrics
Authors
, ,