Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
961371 | Journal of Health Economics | 2008 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
We study the behavioral processes undergirding physician forecasts, evaluating accuracy and systematic biases in estimates of patient survival and characterizing physicians' loss functions when it comes to prediction. Similar to other forecasting experts, physicians face different costs depending on whether their best forecasts prove to be an overestimate or an underestimate of the true probabilities of an event. We provide the first empirical characterization of physicians' loss functions. We find that even the physicians' subjective belief distributions over outcomes are not well calibrated, with the loss characterized by asymmetry in favor of over-predicting patients' survival. We show that the physicians' bias is further increased by (1) reduction of the belief distributions to point forecasts, (2) communication of the forecast to the patient, and (3) physicians' own past experience and reputation.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Marcus Alexander, Nicholas A. Christakis,