Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
963324 | Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money | 2006 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
The issue of transaction costs is the mainstay of the equity market microstructure. Research in the microstructure of futures markets has lagged behind. A primary reason is that futures exchanges in the U.S. do not record bid-ask quotes, requiring these costs to be imputed from transaction price data. A reliable estimator of bid-ask spreads would significantly enhance microstructure research in futures markets. Unique intraday data from the Sydney Futures Exchange (SFE) that include both transaction prices and bid-ask spreads allow us to compare bid-ask spread estimation techniques proposed in the literature against the benchmark of actual spreads in a futures market, and thus identify the best-performing estimator. To maximize relevance, we impose all the constraints that apply in U.S. futures data to perform our estimations. We find that the four bid-ask spread estimators considered significantly underestimate the actual spreads. However, simple moments-based estimators perform better in predicting spreads.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Amber Anand, Ahmet K. Karagozoglu,