Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9639299 | International Journal of Project Management | 2005 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The forensic analysis of failed projects is often intended to identify specific reasons and allocate blame for significant cost overruns. In claim circumstances two approaches are often used: the “measured mile”, and system dynamics simulation modelling. This note compares these approaches and argues that, although it is the most popular approach in litigation, the measured mile method is unreliable in cases where disruptions and delays are a significant part of the explanation for additional costs and late delivery of a project.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Civil and Structural Engineering
Authors
Colin Eden, Terry Williams, Fran Ackermann,