Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9684693 | Journal of Membrane Science | 2005 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
In this work, various AEM are investigated for chromic acid recovery. The membrane fumasep® FAP (FuMA-Tech GmbH) seems to be the most efficient. Its current efficiency is much higher than those previously reported in the literature. Furthermore, the fumasep® FAP is used for process optimisation experiments. The process performance depends on the concentration gradient between product (anolyte) and central compartment (exhausted rinse water) and the temperature. Our results show that batch processing is recommended and the chromate transfer rates through the AEM could be significantly increased when increasing the temperature up to 50 °C. Finally, low initial current density (10-20 mA cmâ2), feed flow rate higher than 7 cm sâ1 could help overcoming the process limitations attributed to high AEM resistance.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Filtration and Separation
Authors
I. Frenzel, H. Holdik, D.F. Stamatialis, G. Pourcelly, M. Wessling,