Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
9684693 Journal of Membrane Science 2005 9 Pages PDF
Abstract
In this work, various AEM are investigated for chromic acid recovery. The membrane fumasep® FAP (FuMA-Tech GmbH) seems to be the most efficient. Its current efficiency is much higher than those previously reported in the literature. Furthermore, the fumasep® FAP is used for process optimisation experiments. The process performance depends on the concentration gradient between product (anolyte) and central compartment (exhausted rinse water) and the temperature. Our results show that batch processing is recommended and the chromate transfer rates through the AEM could be significantly increased when increasing the temperature up to 50 °C. Finally, low initial current density (10-20 mA cm−2), feed flow rate higher than 7 cm s−1 could help overcoming the process limitations attributed to high AEM resistance.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Filtration and Separation
Authors
, , , , ,