Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
969144 | Journal of Public Economics | 2013 | 11 Pages |
Relying on a small natural field experiment conducted by the Norwegian Environmental Protection Agency, I estimate effects of three fundamental elements of most monitoring and enforcement practices: self-reporting, audit frequency and specific deterrence. I find evidence of under-reporting of violations in firms' self-audits, as more violations are detected in on-site audits than in self-audits. Announcing the increased audit frequency has no effect on firms' compliance, but an audit raises subsequent compliance substantially.
► Effects of monitoring and enforcement activities of Environmental Protection Agencies are studied. ► Effect estimates rely on exogenous variation from random assignment of treatments. ► Announcing an increased audit frequency has no effect on firms' compliance. ► Audits raise firms' subsequent compliance substantially. ► Evidence of under-reporting of violations in firms' self-reports.