Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
971386 | The Journal of Socio-Economics | 2009 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Our experiment, which tested support for a hypothetical social welfare program, found that the civically engaged as a whole were resistant to social justice framing employing universalistic versus particularistic standards. We suggest the lack of a framing effect was due to the use of a preexisting, shared “symbolic racism” frame. Social justice framing did succeed for those whose attitudes toward symbolic racism were ambivalent or neutral. Other factors including sex, income level, political participation, and ideology significantly influenced choice. These results provide some indications of limits to experimental framing of policy preferences of the civically engaged in their institutional settings.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Catherine S. Elliott, Keith Fitzgerald, Donald M. Hayward, Stela Krasteva,