Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9731459 | The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance | 2005 | 23 Pages |
Abstract
The existing two-regime asset-pricing models do not reach a consensus, either in the definition of bull and bear market conditions or in the modelling of beta non-stationarity. We apply a logistic smooth transition regression model to address the beta non-stationarity issue. Using eight different definitions of bull and bear market conditions, we intend to ascertain the most appropriate definition with which to capture the non-linear dynamics of security returns. We find, through a series of linearity tests, that the Logistic Smooth Transition Market (LSTM) model provides an adequate description of the data generating process. Further, we explore the adequacy of a duration dependent description of market conditions in our model. Often we find that the 4-month lagged yield spread is a more appropriate definition of market condition than is a coincident economic indicator, excess market returns and a moving average of excess market returns. We also find duration dependence in market conditions.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
George Woodward, Vijaya B. Marisetty,