Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9737175 | International Journal of Drug Policy | 2005 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Tobacco harm reduction (THR) policies aim to reduce the prevalence of tobacco-related harm by encouraging smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit to adopt less harmful ways of obtaining nicotine, such as pharmaceutical nicotine and oral tobacco snuff. Proponents of THR argue that the effects of tobacco control policies have reduced smoking as much as they reasonably can and that we can best reduce tobacco-related harm by encouraging smokers to use these methods, which substantially reduce the health risks of smoking. Critics argue that THR policies will undermine the two traditional tobacco control goals of preventing the uptake of smoking by young people and encouraging smokers to quit. I assess the main arguments and evidence advanced for and against THR.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Psychiatry and Mental Health
Authors
Wayne D. Hall,