Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
986070 | Resources Policy | 2016 | 13 Pages |
•We use a boosting approach to forecast the volatility of gold-price fluctuations.•We use different asymmetric loss functions to evaluate forecasts.•Forecasters benefit from forecasts when underestimation is costlier than overestimation.•We use simulations to assess the significance of benefits.
We use a boosting approach to study the time-varying out-of-sample informational content of various financial and macroeconomic variables for forecasting the volatility of gold-price fluctuations. We use an out-of-sample R2 statistic to evaluate forecasts as a function of the shape of a forecaster's loss function. We show that, when compared to an autoregressive benchmark forecast, those forecasters tend to benefit from using predictions implied by the boosting approach who encounter a larger loss when underestimating rather than overestimating the future volatility of gold-price fluctuations. We use a simulation experiment to study the significance of this benefit.