Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9872374 | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics | 2005 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Conclusion: The risk of fatal secondary malignancy differed substantially between IMRT and conventional radiation therapy for prostate cancer, as well as between different IMRT approaches. Perhaps this risk should be considered when choosing the optimal treatment technique and delivery system for patients who will undergo prostate radiation.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Radiation
Authors
Stephen F. M.S., Mohammad Ph.D., David S. Ph.D., Marilyn Ph.D., Deborah A. M.D., R. Allen Ph.D., Isaac I. Ph.D.,