Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
9872590 International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 2005 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Conclusions: Errors in the delivery of RT are uncommon and usually of little clinical significance. Patient subgroups and technical factors associated with errors can be identified. The introduction of new technology can produce new ways for errors to occur, necessitating ongoing evaluation of RT errors for quality assurance. Modifications to processes of care can produce important reductions in error rates.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Physics and Astronomy Radiation
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,