Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
988773 | World Development | 2014 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
SummaryWe argue that the tilt toward donor interests over recipient needs in aid allocation and practices may be particularly strong in new partnerships. Using the natural experiment of Eastern transition we find that commercial and strategic concerns influenced both aid flows and entry in the first half of the 1990s, but much less so later on. We also find that fractionalization increased and that early aid to the region was particularly volatile, unpredictable and tied. Our results may explain why aid to Iraq and Afghanistan has had little development impact and serves as warning for Burma and Arab Spring regimes.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Emmanuel Frot, Anders Olofsgård, Maria Perrotta Berlin,