Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9902254 | Journal of Immunological Methods | 2005 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Development of immunogenicity assays for assessment of human antibodies to therapeutic proteins requires a quantitative determination of assay sensitivity. In the absence of true human positive controls, this is usually accomplished by utilizing affinity-purified antibodies from non-human primates or monoclonal antibodies. In the former case, it is generally considered that non-human primate antibodies will be recognized equally to human antibodies by secondary anti-human immunoglobulin reagents used in immunogenicity assays. We present results here demonstrating that this is not the case. In reality, anti-human immunoglobulin secondary antibodies do not recognize primate immunoglobulins as well as human immunoglobulins. As a result, the use of affinity purified primate antibodies to determine the sensitivity of an immunogenicity assay will likely result in the true sensitivity of the assay being underestimated.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biotechnology
Authors
James S. Bourdage, John T. Brandt, Thomas N. Lee, Robert J. Konrad,