Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9905690 | European Journal of Cancer | 2005 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Patients were placed in either in group A (irinotecan 350 mg/m2/3 weeks and 400 mg/m2 cetuximab at week 2 then 250 mg/m2/week) or group B (cetuximab weekly starting week 1 then irinotecan starting week 4). Patient plasma or serum samples from each treatment arm were analysed using HPLC and ELISA. Among 14 patients, compartmental model showed no significant differences in mean plasma AUC at week 1 versus week 4 for irinotecan (44,388 versus 39,800 μg/ml/h) and cetuximab (20,441 versus 23,363 μg/ml/h), respectively. Half-lifes (standard deviations) for irinotecan were 16.02 (±8.41) h at week 1 and 13.99 (±2.14) h at week 4, and for cetuximab 106 (±32) at week 3 and 111 (±30) h at week 4. Mean concentration-versus-time profiles either alone or in combination were superimposable for cetuximab and irinotecan. From this study, we conclude that there is no evidence of pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cetuximab.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Cancer Research
Authors
Catherine Delbaldo, Jean-Yves Pierga, Véronique Dieras, Sandrine Faivre, Valérie Laurence, Jean-Claude Vedovato, Marc Bonnay, Matthias Mueser, Arno Nolting, Andreas Kovar, Eric Raymond,