Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10026589 | The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics | 2005 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Pleural effusions may result from various inflammatory, hemodynamic, or neoplastic conditions. A common diagnostic problem lies in distinguishing malignant from benign pleural effusions using routine cytological evaluation. We studied pleural fluid samples obtained from 14 patients with histologically confirmed malignancy and from 6 patients with benign pleural effusions using 12 microsatellite markers from 8 different chromosomal regions. Supernatants and cellular sediments of all 20 pleural fluid samples were analyzed. Routine cytological examination was 100% specific for malignancy but was only 57% sensitive. Microsatellite analyses of pleural fluid supernatants showed genetic alterations in tumor patients only. However, 50% of pleural effusions that were considered negative for malignancy by routine cytological analysis showed either loss of heterozygosity or microsatellite instability. The sensitivity of pleural fluid examination rose to 79% when routine cytological assessment was supplemented by molecular studies. Our data suggest that microsatellite analysis increases the sensitivity of cytological pleural fluid examination in assessing potential malignancy and that combining cytological and molecular methods may improve yield and certainty in diagnostically challenging cases.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Health Informatics
Authors
Matthias Woenckhaus, Ulrike Grepmeier, Bernhard Werner, Christian Schulz, Felix Rockmann, Peter J. Wild, Georg Röckelein, Hagen Blaszyk, Marion Schuierer, Ferdinand Hofstaedter, Arndt Hartmann, Wolfgang Dietmaier,