| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1006707 | Research in Accounting Regulation | 2011 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
We study the relation between analysts’ ratings of firms’ credit worthiness and ratings of the quality of firms’ (1) annual report disclosures, (2) quarterly and other disclosures, and (3) manager-analyst communications. We find that credit ratings are better for firms with higher rated annual report disclosures. We also find that marked increases in analyst ratings of annual report quality are accompanied by improvements in credit ratings. We find no relation between credit ratings and analysts’ ratings of either quarterly report disclosures or management-analyst communications. Overall, the results suggest that a commitment to better annual report disclosure is related to a lower cost of credit capital.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Business, Management and Accounting
Accounting
Authors
Frank Heflin, Kenneth W. Shaw, John J. Wild,
